| Abstract|| |
A prospective survey of parents of the children with congenital heart disesease was conducted to determine their awareness as regards the importance of oral hygiene and prophylaxis against infective endocarditis (IE). The results of this study demonstrated that only 8% of the parents were aware of the importance of good oro-dental hygiene and need for IE prophylaxis.
Keywords: Infective endocarditis prophylaxis, congenital heart disease, parents, awareness.
|How to cite this article:|
Nath P, Kiran V, Maheshwari S. Awareness of infective endocarditis prophylaxis in parents of children with congenital heart disease: A prospective survey. Ann Pediatr Card 2008;1:54-5
|How to cite this URL:|
Nath P, Kiran V, Maheshwari S. Awareness of infective endocarditis prophylaxis in parents of children with congenital heart disease: A prospective survey. Ann Pediatr Card [serial online] 2008 [cited 2020 Aug 14];1:54-5. Available from: http://www.annalspc.com/text.asp?2008/1/1/54/41057
| Introduction|| |
Heart disease is prevalent in children, and infective endocarditis (IE) is a potential complication in any child with heart disease. Although the fact that IE can occur in children with heart disease is well known among the medical fraternity, it is unknown how widespread this knowledge has been disseminated to the community, specifically to the parents of children with heart disease
A prospective verbal survey was therefore conducted in our hospital to assess how much and how many parents of children suffering from congenital heart diseases (CHDs) knew about the importance of and need for IE prophylaxis. The study period ranged from January 2005 to July 2006. Following three questions were asked to parents of 500 consecutive children known to be suffering from CHD.
- How often does your child brush his/her teeth?
- Do you know what to tell your child's dentist, if at all he/she has to see a dentist?
- Are you aware of IE prophylaxis for your child?
The answers were then collected and analyzed.
Of the 500 children surveyed, 263 were boys and 237 were girls. The answers to the questions are detailed in [Table 1],[Table 2].
Out of 500 children, 74% brushed their teeth once, 21.4% brushed twice, 4% were irregular in brushing and 0.6% never brushed their teeth at all
The visual assessment of oral cavity was done in all the children. They were classified as having good oral hygiene (normal oral cavity), fair oral hygiene (mild discoloration or plaque), or poor oral hygiene (visible caries, halitosis or gingivitis). On oral cavity examination, 141 children had good oral hygiene (28%); in 261 children, the oral hygiene was fair (52%) and in 98 children, it was poor (19%).
Questions 2 and 3:
Out of the 500 parents, only 40 (8%) knew what they had to tell their child's dentist, if they had to visit him/her.
| Discussion|| |
Infective endocarditis is a potentially life-threatening condition despite several advances in its diagnosis and treatment. The estimated incidence of IE in the Western population has remained unchanged over the past two decades at 1.7-6.2 cases per 100,000 patient-years, ,, but such estimates are not available from India. Even assuming the lowest incidence, at least 17,000 episodes of IE must be occurring per year. ,,,
A number of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures can cause transient bacteremia; hence, IE prophylaxis is very important. IE could be acute, wherein the course is rapid and fulminant with death occurring within 6 weeks if untreated. It is commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. The subacute IE has a slow, indolent course of several months duration, and is commonly caused by Streptococcus viridans. ,
Since 1997, cardiac conditions were classified as high, moderate, and negligible risk groups and accordingly required IE prophylaxis. However, in October 2007, American Heart Association and European Cardiac Society came up with new recommendations for IE prophylaxis.  The pertinence of these guidelines in India is unclear as dental hygiene is suboptimal and presumably not at par with the Western standards. In this context, the earlier recommendations are still being followed in many centers, including ours.
There are very few studies , carried out regarding IE "awareness" and most of the studies showed that parental knowledge of IE prophylaxis is limited. These studies are from the 1980s and 1990s. Although the last two decades have seen significant technological advances, our study demonstrates that the basic management of children with heart disease still remains suboptimal.
The reasons for non-awareness of the need for good oral hygiene and IE prophylaxis could be poor socioeconomic status, illiteracy or ignorance among parents or a lack of education on the subject by medical personnel. Although we cannot change the socioeconomic and literacy status of families, one area where the medical community can effect a definite change is in education of families of children with heart disease. Education via pamphlets and via repeated mention of oral hygiene and IE prophylaxis at each clinic visit can help in building awareness among families.
| Conclusion|| |
The results of this study demonstrated that only 8% of parents of children suffering from CHDs were aware of the need for IE prophylaxis and out of 500 children only 28% had good oral hygiene. Hence, a serious attempt has to be made by pediatricians and pediatric cardiologists to educate parents on importance of good oral hygiene the need for IE prophylaxis in children with heart disease.
| References|| |
|1.||Kothari SS, Ramakrishna S, Bahl VK. Infective endocarditis: An Indian perspective. Indian Heart J 2005;57:289-94. |
|2.||Berlin JA, Abrutyn E, Storm BL, Kinman JL, Levison ME, Korzeniowski OM, et al. Incidence of infective endocarditis in the Delaware valley, 1988-1990. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:933-6. |
|3.||Hogevik H Olaison L, Anderrson R, Lindberg I, Alestig K. Epidemiologic aspects of infective endocarditis in an urban population: A 5 year prospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 1995;74:324-39. |
|4.||Garg N, Kandpal B, Garg N, Tewari S, Kapoor A, Goel P, et al. Characteristics of Infective endocarditis in a developing country-clinical profile and outcome in 192 Indian patients: 1992-2001. Int J Cardiol 2005;98:253-60. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|5.||Choudury R, Grover A, Varma J, Kathri HN, Anand IS, Bidkai PS, et al. Active Infective endocarditis observed in an Indian Hospital: 1981-1991. Am J Cardiol 1992;70:1453-8. |
|6.||Jala S, Khan KA, Alai MS, Jan V, Iqbal K, Tramboo NA, et al. Clinical spectrum of Infective endocarditis: 15 years experience. Indian Heart J 1998;50:516-9. |
|7.||Sandre RM, Shafran SD. Infective endocarditis: Review of 135 cases over 9 years. Clin Infect Dis 1996;22:276-86. [PUBMED] |
|8.||Levison ME. Infective endocarditis. In: Bennett JC, Plum F, editors. Cecil text book of Medicine. 20th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1996. p. 1596-602. |
|9.||Dajani AS, Taubert KA, Wilson W, Bolger AF, Bayer A, Ferrieri P, et al. Prevention of bacterial endocarditis. Recommendations by the American Heart Association. JAMA 1997;277:1794-9. |
|10.||Sholler GF, Celermajer JM. Prophylaxis of bacterial endocarditis awareness of need. Med L Aust 1984; 140:650-652 |
|11.||Cetta F, Bett TJ, Podlecki DD, Ros SP. Parental knowledge of bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis. Pediatric Cardiol 1993;14:220-2. |
|12.||Wilson W, Taubert KA, Gewitz M, Lockhart PB, Baddour LM, Levison M, et al. Prevention of infective endocarditis: guidelines from the American Heart Association: A guideline from the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation 2007;116:1736-54. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Narayana Hrudayalaya, No 258/A, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore - 560 099, Karnataka
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Table 1], [Table 2]