Annals of Pediatric Cardiology
About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Instructions | Submission | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
     
     
 


 

 
     
    Advanced search
 

 
 
     
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1466    
    Printed41    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded94    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents   
CASE REPORT  
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 201-203
Three-dimensional printing in surgical planning: A case of aortopulmonary window with interrupted aortic arch


1 Division of Cardiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Heart Institute, Cincinnati, OH, USA
2 Division of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Heart Institute, Cincinnati, OH, USA

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication4-May-2018
 

   Abstract 


Better anatomical understanding and conceptualization of complex congenital heart defects using three-dimensional (3D) printing may improve surgical planning, especially in rare defects. In this report, we utilized 3D printing to delineate the exact cardiac anatomy of a neonate with an aortopulmonary window associated with interrupted aortic arch to devise a novel approach to the repair.

Keywords: Aortopulmonary window, interrupted aortic arch, three-dimensional printing

How to cite this article:
Moore RA, Wallen WJ, Riggs KW, Morales DL. Three-dimensional printing in surgical planning: A case of aortopulmonary window with interrupted aortic arch. Ann Pediatr Card 2018;11:201-3

How to cite this URL:
Moore RA, Wallen WJ, Riggs KW, Morales DL. Three-dimensional printing in surgical planning: A case of aortopulmonary window with interrupted aortic arch. Ann Pediatr Card [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Mar 28];11:201-3. Available from: http://www.annalspc.com/text.asp?2018/11/2/201/231819





   Introduction Top


Surgical planning in congenital heart disease may be challenging due to the complex relationships among various components of the malformed heart despite advanced three-dimensional (3D) virtual modeling.[1] One of the most recent techniques is the creation of a 3D physical model using rapid prototyping (syn: 3D-printing; additive manufacturing) technology.[2]

This technology has been used widely for surgical planning in maxillofacial, cranial, and dental surgeries, as well as, for teaching purposes.[3],[4] This report demonstrates utilization of a 3D-printed heart model to plan the surgery for a neonate with an aortopulmonary window (APW) and interrupted aortic arch (IAA).


   Case Report Top


A 7-day-old, 2.5 kg full-term, neonate was diagnosed with IAA distal to the left subclavian artery (type A), APW and large patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Echocardiography confirmed the diagnosis [Figure 1]. Computed tomography (CT) was obtained to further demonstrate the relative position of the APW to the interruption [Figure 2]. It became clear during the surgical conference that both 2D imaging planes and a 3D-CT reconstruction limited the ability to interpret the size/position of the APW and its proximity to the interruption. We decided to utilize a 3D-printed model to help plan the surgical approach. The CT data was imported into Mimics Innovation Suite 3D visualization software (Materialise Inc., Belgium) and segmentation was performed. The 3D-model rendering was then converted to a 3D-printable stereolithography (STL) file. The STL file was then 3D-printed utilizing a color powder plastic printer (3D-Systems; Projet 4500 ColorJet). The model was available <6 h after the conference and was reviewed with the surgeon before the procedure the next morning.
Figure 1: Echocardiogram image in the suprasternal notch position. Color compare acquisition showing a sweep from the interrupted aortic arch to the ductal arch and descending aorta. The proximal aortopulmonary window is seen at the lower left corner of the color box

Click here to view
Figure 2: Computed tomography sagittal image demonstrating the interrupted aortic arch (frame a, yellow arrow) and the ductal arch (frame b, red arrow). The two-dimensional images limit the ability to view the entire defect in one plane; however, three-dimensional renderings easily demonstrate the entire anomaly

Click here to view


The 3D-model allowed a clear appreciation of the extent of the APW and its proximity to the interruption [Figure 3]. The APW took the entire left lateral and posterior side of aorta and even wrapped around to the part of the right lateral side (2/3 circumference of the aorta), which was not well appreciated on our standard imaging. It became clear to the surgeon that he would be able to transect the aorta just proximal and distal to the APW and use the anterior wall of the aorta hinged above the most leftward aspect of the APW to close the pulmonary atresia side of the defect. The 3D model also made it clear that the surgeon could primarily anastomose the ascending aorta with space to sew the descending aorta to the proximal arch and extend onto the left subclavian (arch advancement). The surgeon was able to repair the defect in this manner under antegrade cerebral perfusion and use no patch material. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was discharged from the Intensive Care Unit on postoperative day 5, to home on postoperative day 13, and is clinically well 4 years later.
Figure 3: Three-dimensional model. AAo: Ascending aorta, APW: Aortopulmonary window, DAo: Descending aorta, IAA: Interrupted aortic arch, LPA: Left pulmonary artery, LScA: Left subclavian artery, LV: Left ventricle, MPA: Main pulmonary artery, PDA: Patent ductus arteriousus, RPA: Right pulmonary artery, RV: Right ventricle

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


APW is a rare congenital heart malformation with an incidence of <0.3% of all congenital heart diseases. Fifty percent of cases are associated with other cardiac anomalies, of which, IAA, especially type A, is the most frequently encountered association in 22% of APWs.[5] The association of both anomalies increases the risk of neonatal mortality to 22% and the risk of postoperative re-intervention for recurrent aortic or pulmonary stenosis to 29% compared to simple APW.[6]

Use of 3D-printing technology has been reported in congenital heart surgery. Kiraly et al. reported usage of the 3D-printing for surgical planning of a multilevel aortic arch obstruction after a modified Norwood procedure.[7] They stated that CT angiography could not reveal the exact site, severity or possible twisting of the involved segments; however, the 3D-model enabled them to repair the obstruction using autologous flaps without the need for further patching. Furthermore, Valverde et al. used a 3D-model to plan for surgery in a patient with transposition of great arteries, ventricular septal defect (VSD), and pulmonary stenosis.[1] They reported that the 3D-model helped identify the spatial relationships between the VSD, outlet septum and the great arteries. Enhanced understanding of the anatomic relationships revealed that the Nikaidoh procedure was a more favorable approach than the Rastelli operation.

In the present case, 3D-printing helped us identify the size of this unique APW and its proximity to the interruption, which in turn allowed us to devise a repair of both defects using only native tissue. It is standard at our institution to perform an arch advancement without patch material, but in this unique case, the surgeon was uncertain patch material could be avoided until he was able to assess the 3D-printed model. At our hospital, we have used 3D-printing technology to predict the intraoperative scenario and plan innovative surgical repairs. We feel that it has reduced the operative time, improved the surgical decision planning, and reduced overall health-care burden of complex cases, which is starting to be objectively measured. With that in mind, each model costs between $100 and $500 but has been invaluable in certain scenarios. We find 3D printing particularly helpful when performing complex surgery involving electrophysiology. When performing a Fontan conversion on a patient who required a unique lesion set for his Maze, we were able to 3D-print his heart in a clear rubber-like material (TangoJet-clear). We examined his anatomy with our electrophysiologists to determine the lesion set preoperatively which improved efficiency in the operating room while the heart was arrested. We presently use 3D-printing of congenital heart defects on a weekly basis for complex surgical repairs or combined hybrid procedures.

Moreover, 3D-printing is helpful for educational and training purposes. It provides physical models that help navigate the complex pathological anatomy for both physicians and families. Costello et al. conducted a study on 23 pediatric residents who underwent a 60 minute simulation of VSDs using 3D-models. The residents showed improvement in knowledge acquisition and better structural conceptualization of VSDs in comparison to the non-3D model group.[8] Practicing surgery on these models by junior surgeons enhanced their understanding of the interspatial relations of complex pathology, familiarized them with sophisticated procedures, and improved their surgical skill.[2] Overall, we believe that 3D-printing technology represents a paradigm shift in imaging that will enhance surgical planning, education for health-care providers and families, and is already impacting how we care for patients with congenital heart disease.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Valverde I, Gomez G, Gonzalez A, Suarez-Mejias C, Adsuar A, Coserria JF, et al. Three-dimensional patient-specific cardiac model for surgical planning in Nikaidoh procedure. Cardiol Young 2015;25:698-704.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Zechmann CM, Unterhinninghofen R, Kauczor HU, et al. 3D printing based on imaging data: Review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2010;5:335-41.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
D'Souza N, Mainprize J, Edwards G, Binhammer P, Antonyshyn O. Teaching facial fracture repair: A novel method of surgical skills training using three-dimensional biomodels. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2015;23:81-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Nikzad S, Azari A, Ghassemzadeh A. Modified flapless dental implant surgery for planning treatment in a maxilla including sinus lift augmentation through use of virtual surgical planning and a 3-dimensional model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:2291-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Murin P, Sinzobahamvya N, Blaschczok HCh, Photiadis J, Haun C, Asfour B, et al. Aortopulmonary window associated with interrupted aortic arch: Report of surgical repair of eight cases and review of literature. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;60:215-20.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Roubertie F, Kalfa D, Vergnat M, Ly M, Lambert V, Belli E, et al. Aortopulmonary window and the interrupted aortic arch: Midterm results with use of the single-patch technique. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;99:186-91.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Kiraly L, Tofeig M, Jha NK, Talo H. Three-dimensional printed prototypes refine the anatomy of post-modified norwood-1 complex aortic arch obstruction and allow presurgical simulation of the repair. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016;22:238-40.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Costello JP, Olivieri LJ, Su L, Krieger A, Alfares F, Thabit O, et al. Incorporating three-dimensional printing into a simulation-based congenital heart disease and critical care training curriculum for resident physicians. Congenit Heart Dis 2015;10:185-90.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. David LS Morales
Division of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Heart Institute, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 2013, Cincinnati, OH 45229
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/apc.APC_127_17

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top