Annals of Pediatric Cardiology
About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Instructions | Submission | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
     
     
 


 

 
     
    Advanced search
 

 
 
     
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed256    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded20    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents   
LETTER TO EDITOR  
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 102-103
Virtual dissection: An alternative to surface-rendered virtual three-dimensional cardiac model


1 Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Institute of Genetic Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission01-Sep-2019
Date of Acceptance16-Sep-2019
Date of Web Publication04-Dec-2019
 

How to cite this article:
Gupta SK, Anderson RH. Virtual dissection: An alternative to surface-rendered virtual three-dimensional cardiac model. Ann Pediatr Card 2020;13:102-3

How to cite this URL:
Gupta SK, Anderson RH. Virtual dissection: An alternative to surface-rendered virtual three-dimensional cardiac model. Ann Pediatr Card [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Mar 31];13:102-3. Available from: http://www.annalspc.com/text.asp?2020/13/1/102/272271




Sir,

We read with interest the report by Garekar et al.[1] We congratulate the authors for using surface-rendered virtual three-dimensional (3D) heart model for surgical planning without physically printing the model. Any effort to save cost is commendable. The expenditure, however, is not only from the printing of the 3D model but also from the need for specialized software. As highlighted by the authors, the conversion of a volumetric dataset to a virtual 3D model requires advanced software and coordination among various experts. The requirement of such expensive software limits the use of 3D printing in clinical practice. A similar virtual 3D heart model can also be created using open-source software but mandates navigation through a nondedicated cumbersome workflow.

Virtual dissection, a modification of volume rendering, is yet another technique for the creation and visualization of virtual cardiac models.[2] Although computationally more complex compared to surface rendering, it is possible to achieve good-quality volume rendering even on a personal computer. We recently proposed a low-cost technique of virtual dissection using open-source software.[3] This technique can be easily performed on a Macintosh personal computer and provides excellent visualization of cardiac morphology.[3],[4],[5] The surface rendering utilizes only a portion of the dataset, while virtual dissection incorporates the whole of the dataset and produces high fidelity 3D cardiac model.[3] Real-time rotation and cropping of the virtual volume in Horos software permit visualization in clinically relevant views, making it a perfect tool for assessment of cardiac morphology for presurgical planning [Figure 1]. In contrast, virtual models created for 3D print can only be visualized in predefined slices of the heart limiting its potential in complete delineation of cardiac morphology.[1]
Figure 1: Virtual dissection from a 20-month-old child with double outlet right ventricle in anteroposterior (a) and left anterior oblique (b) projection. The interventricular communication (red dotted circle and double-headed red arrow) is located in the subaortic region. The relationship with the inflow and the outflow of the right ventricle confirms that the aorta can be committed to the left ventricle by simply placing a patch (double-headed yellow arrow). All other details including the fossa ovalis (*), ostium of the coronary artery, and right ventricular outflow are also well illustrated. LA: Left atrium, LV: Left ventricle, PA: Pulmonary trunk, RA: Right atrium, RAA: Right atrial appendage, RV: Right ventricle, SCV: Superior caval vein

Click here to view


We believe that a 3D model derived from Horos-based virtual dissection is a better alternative to a virtual 3D model obtained from surface rendering with the added advantage of saving cost.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Garekar S, Bharati A, Kothari F, Patil S, Dhake S, Mali S, et al. Virtual three-dimensional model for preoperative planning in a complex case of a double outlet right ventricle. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2019;12:295-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Mori S, Fukuzawa K, Takaya T, Takamine S, Ito T, Fujiwara S, et al. Clinical cardiac structural anatomy reconstructed within the cardiac contour using multidetector-row computed tomography: Atrial septum and ventricular septum. Clin Anat 2016;29:342-52.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Gupta SK, Spicer DE, Anderson RH. A new low-cost method of virtual cardiac dissection of computed tomographic datasets. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2019;12:110-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Talwar S, Siddharth B, Gupta SK, Bhoje A, Choudhary SK. Surgical repair for common arterial trunk with pulmonary dominance, hypoplasia of ascending aorta, and interrupted aortic arch. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2019;12:287-91.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Gupta SK, Aggarwal A, Shaw M, Gulati GS, Ramakrishnan S, Saxena A, et al. Clarifying the anatomy of common arterial trunk – A clinical study of 70 patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jez255. [Epub ahead of print].  Back to cited text no. 5
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Saurabh Kumar Gupta
Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/apc.APC_127_19

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top