Annals of Pediatric Cardiology
About us | Current Issue | Archives | Ahead of Print | Instructions | Submission | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Ahead of Print

Clinical and hemodynamic effect of endothelin receptor antagonists in eisenmenger syndrome


1 Faculty of Medicine, Universitas YARSI, Jakarta, Indonesia
2 Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Banten, Indonesia
3 Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia/ Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
4 Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Tangerang District Hospital, Tangerang. Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
5 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medika Permata Hijau Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
6 Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita, Jakarta, Indonesia

Correspondence Address:
Emir Yonas,
Faculty of Medicine, Universitas YARSI, Jl. Letjend Suprapto No. 1, RW. 5, Cemp. Putih Timur, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10510
Indonesia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/apc.APC_196_19

Introduction: Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) are widely accepted as a specific treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Unfortunately, consensus and recommendations are lacking for the treatment of patients who suffer from pulmonary arterial hypertension and congenital heart disease, including Eisenmenger syndrome. Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effect of ERA on patients with Eisenmenger syndrome. Methods: Electronic search on PubMed (MEDLINE), EBSCO, EuropePMC, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar was done. Studies involving the use of ERAs on Eisenmenger syndrome patients were included. There were 18 studies included. The primary outcome of interest was the 6-min walking test distance before and after exposure to ERA. Results: There were 517 patients with Eisenmenger syndrome. The subjects had Eisenmenger syndrome secondary to congenital heart disorders, with WHO functional Class ranging from Class I–IV. The follow-up ranges from a mean of 4–60 months. Seventeen studies reported a statistically significant difference between pretreatment and the posttreatment result of 6-min walking test distance. Pooled mean difference comparing pre and posttreatment values yielded an increase of 55.24 m (42.15, 68.33) P < 0.001; moderate heterogeneity I2 51% P = 0.008. Pooled mean pulmonary vascular resistance index difference comparing pre and posttreatment values yielded a decrease of 4.76 woods unit (-6.86, -2.66), P < 0.001 favoring posttreatment; low heterogeneity I2 0%, P = 0.82. Pooled mean mean pulmonary arterial pressure difference comparing pre and posttreatment values yielded a decrease of 5.40 mmHg (-7.53, -3.28), P < 0.001 favoring posttreatment, low heterogeneity I2 0%, P = 0.65. Conclusion: Implementation of ERA in Eisenmenger improves 6-min walking distance and pulmonary vascular pressure indices. Earlier administration of ERA might be beneficial, further studies are needed to assess mortality benefit of this agent.


Print this article
Search
 Back
 
  Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Yonas E
    -  Pranata R
    -  Yamin M
    -  Nusarintowati N
    -  Nauli SE
    -  Abdulgani HB
    -  Siswanto BB
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed48    
    PDF Downloaded7    

Recommend this journal