Article Access Statistics | | Viewed | 1723 | | Printed | 30 | | Emailed | 0 | | PDF Downloaded | 107 | | Comments | [Add] | |
|

 Click on image for details.
|
|
|
Year : 2017
| Volume
: 10 | Issue : 2 | Page
: 220 |
|
Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease: A cross-sectional observational study from North India |
|
Mahmood Dhahir Al-Mendalawi
Department of Paediatrics, Al-Kindy College of Medicine, Baghdad University, Baghdad, Iraq
Click here for correspondence address and
email
Date of Web Publication | 25-Apr-2017 |
|
|
 |
|
How to cite this article: Al-Mendalawi MD. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease: A cross-sectional observational study from North India. Ann Pediatr Card 2017;10:220 |
How to cite this URL: Al-Mendalawi MD. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease: A cross-sectional observational study from North India. Ann Pediatr Card [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Apr 20];10:220. Available from: https://www.annalspc.com/text.asp?2017/10/2/220/205141 |
Sir,
I read with interest the study by Saxena et al. on the birth prevalence of congenital heart diseases (CHDs) in India.[1] Based on routine clinical examination and pulse oximetry, followed by screening echocardiography for diagnosing CHDs, the authors estimated 8.07/1000 live births the prevalence of CHDs in their studied cohort. I presume that the actual prevalence of CHDs might be underrated. This is based on the following five points.
First, the aforementioned prevalence was extracted from hospital-based data. Community-based data could better elucidate the true prevalence of CHDs.
Second, the estimated prevalence was related only to live births and did not include macerated or malformed babies who might have CHDs.
Third, in spite of making significant progress in increasing institutional births in India, the rate of home delivery is still substantial (37.7%).[2] Therefore, a good number of babies with CHDs born at home are expected to abscond medical registration.
Fourth, consanguineous marriages (CMs) is still culturally preferred in India with an estimated prevalence of 12.3%.[3] Parental consanguinity, in particular, first-cousin marriage between parents, has been noticed to be one of the important risk factors for the occurrence of CHDs in India.[4] Interestingly, only 18.7% of people surveyed in India were aware of various health hazards associated with CMs.[3]
Fifth, due to the limited diagnostic precision of echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has recently expanded its role in the diagnosis and management of CHDs and acquired heart diseases in the pediatric patients. It provides much diagnostic information to guide decisions.[5] I presume that conducting large-scale studies in India employing CMR could better delineate the true prevalence and pattern of CHDs in the pediatric population.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References | |  |
1. | Saxena A, Mehta A, Sharma M, Salhan S, Kalaivani M, Ramakrishnan S, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease: A cross-sectional observational study from North India. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2016;9:205-9. |
2. | Sahoo J, Singh SV, Gupta VK, Garg S, Kishore J. Do socio-demographic factors still predict the choice of place of delivery: A cross-sectional study in rural North India. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2015;5 4 Suppl 1:S27-34. |
3. | Joseph N, Pavan KK, Ganapathi K, Apoorva P, Sharma P, Jhamb JA. Health awareness and consequences of consanguineous marriages: A community-based study. J Prim Care Community Health 2015;6:121-7. |
4. | Ramegowda S, Ramachandra NB. Parental consanguinity increases congenital heart diseases in South India. Ann Hum Biol 2006;33:519-28. |
5. | Valsangiacomo Buechel ER, Grosse-Wortmann L, Fratz S, Eichhorn J, Sarikouch S, Greil GF, et al. Indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children with congenital and acquired heart disease: An expert consensus paper of the Imaging Working Group of the AEPC and the Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Section of the EACVI. Cardiol Young 2015;25:819-38. |

Correspondence Address: Mahmood Dhahir Al-Mendalawi Department of Paediatrics, Al-Kindy College of Medicine, Baghdad University, Baghdad Iraq
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/apc.APC_124_16

|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|